Tiptree for labs and institutions
The case you can forward to a committee: provenance, privacy, identity, and membership, each answered on its own page.
Tiptree adoption runs bottom-up, individual researchers first, then their labs. By the time a committee looks at it, researchers in the lab are often already using it, and the question is on what terms to formalize that. Each question below is answered on its own page.
| What committees ask | The answer, and where it lives |
|---|---|
| Where do answers come from? | Source-linked outputs product-wide, benchmarked in a public preprint. Provenance and accuracy |
| What happens to our researchers' data? | Per-request consent before anything leaves a conversation; readable, editable memory. Privacy and consent |
| Who else is on the network? | Verified researchers only; membership user-controlled. What is Research Network |
| How is identity verified? | OpenReview as the identity stamp, institutional domains checked. Verified identity |
| Who builds this? | Researchers out of Mila, publishing their infrastructure. About Tiptree Systems |
A dedicated network
A lab can start before anything formal: a dedicated coordinator network for the group, members joining from their own accounts, the same consent rules inside. We provision it; setup takes a conversation, and it gives you a live trial of the coordination model on your own people. Talk to us to start one.
Self-hosting
Self-hosting starts as a conversation with us today. If your requirements point that way (on-premises control, data boundaries, procurement constraints), we plan it with you.
There is no pricing yet. Access is free for publishing researchers, and institutional arrangements are worked out with us.